Cayman Islands Trusts and the ‘rule in Hastings Bass’

02/18/2020

  Download as PDF

Section 64A of the Cayman Islands Trusts Law (2020) Revision codifies the ‘rule in Hastings-Bass’. It provides that, where a person in the exercise of a fiduciary power did not take into account one or more considerations (whether of fact or of law or both) relevant to the exercise of the power or took into account irrelevant considerations and due to such failure the person would not have exercised such fiduciary power or would have exercised it differently, the Court may set aside the exercise of the power in whole or in part and on such conditions (if any) as the Court thinks fit and may make such order consequent upon the setting aside of the exercise of the power, as the Court thinks fit.

An application to the Court under section 64A, may be made by (i) the person who holds the power; (ii) a beneficiary; (iii) an enforcer of a STAR trust; (iv) a trustee; (v) the Attorney General in the case of a charitable trust; or (vi) any other person with the leave of the Court.

To the extent that the exercise of the power is set aside by the Court under section 64A, it shall be treated as never having occurred.

Section 64A expressly provides that it need not be alleged or proven that, in the exercise of the power, the person or any advisor of the person who exercised the power acted in breach of trust or in breach of duty. Section 64A therefore diverges from the position under English law as decided by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Pitt v HMRC [2013] UKSC 26.

Section 64A should be welcomed by trustees and beneficiaries alike, as the provision allows the Court to ‘turn back the clock’ in cases meeting the requisite criteria. This can mean avoiding the unintended adverse financial consequences of the exercise of a fiduciary power. An application under section 64A may provide a more expeditious and less costly means of remedying a mistake that has occurred in the administration of a trust than a professional negligence claim against a trustee or its advisors.

About the Author
Wendy Stenning is a senior associate in the firm’s private client and wealth management group in the Cayman Islands. She has significant experience advising trust companies and high net worth individuals on the establishment and ongoing administration of a variety of trusts.

 

The information contained in this bulletin is provided for the general interest of our readers, but is not intended to constitute legal advice. Clients and the general public are encouraged to seek specific advice on matters of concern. This bulletin can in no way serve as a substitute in such cases. Copyright ©2020 Higgs & Johnson. All rights reserved.

The Bahamas: COVID-19 and Contractual Force Majeure

Introduction Arising from the emergence of COVID-19, it has become obvious that there shall be a massive impact upon...

FOCUS Vol. 64, Issue 1/2020

The issue provides guidance to Bahamian employers as to their obligations during COVID-19; the principles of testamentary freedom and...